Introduction

Nobody argues that what exists is not logically correct. For if the universe did not comply with what is reasonable, then we could never be able to discuss or debate anything. For every discussion assumes that every fact that is debated is subject to reason. Thus, anyone who argues or debates is admitting by the very act of debating that the universe is operated by the rules of logic or reason. You cannot argue that there are no rules of debate. For that would be a contradiction of terms since there you are debating.

And so, the events in the universe must be consistent with the principles of logic, and the facts of reality must comply with reason. For you cannot prove that the universe is not logically correct. In fact, it is the very purpose of the universe to demonstrate what is logical. For it would be the definition of absurdity to suggest otherwise. We must conclude, therefore, that our own existence also is for the purpose of demonstrating what is just, true, and logically correct. For since human beings are part of the universe, we cannot prove that the existence of human beings contradicts the principles of logic and reason.

Now since it is the purpose of the universe to demonstrate the principles of logic, there must be creatures in the universe whose behavior and existence is determined by how they reason and not by mere instinct. Then the principles of logic will be demonstrated by how they use reason in order to exist. For logic determines what is true in order to establish what exists, and humans decide about what is true so they can continue to live.

For nothing exists unless Logic has proven that its existence is true. Yet, if the existence of the universe proves anything to be true, then the fact that it's false must still prove that it's true. For even the whole universe was derived from complete non-existence. And logic assures us that even a premise that is false can still lead to a conclusion that is true. If the argument that existence is not logical proves that existence is logical (since there you are using logic in your debate about what exists), then existence IS logical. And if it is true of the whole subject of logic that what is not logical proves that it is logical, then this must also be true of every statement that is true. If a statement is true, then even the fact that it is false must prove it is true.

So, if the purpose of man is to demonstrate what is right, if a human's existence proves anything to be true, then even his death must result in his life. There must be a resurrection for those who stake their life on what is right.

Some arguments about this page.

I will add to this as God gives insight.
Some other short articles of introduction:
Other examples of how facts that are false prove to be true.
How does a human life represent a proposition of logic?
How the resurrection is a natural conclusion of human debate.
So why should we believe the story about Jesus?


Further dabate can be found here.